Sunday, April 22

What about Hillary?

Well, while we're on the subject, here's an article about Hillary in Iowa yesterday. So what do I think?

She says if she's elected she'll make Bill a roving goodwill ambassador. That sounds like a pretty good idea.

She denounced the Bush administration, which she said has left the government incompetent. "They have shown contempt for our government," Clinton said. "We've got to get back to having qualified people, not cronies, serving in the government of the United States."

She said Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney have done lasting damage. "I don't think we know all the damage that this president and vice president have done," Clinton said.

I basically agree with that statement. But I don't think the answer is better bureaucracy. I think it's less bureaucracy.

"You've got to have more help for communities when you have a lot of undocumented workers because they have costs associated with that and they don't set immigration policy," Clinton said.

She also said any immigration reform must be tougher on businesses that hire illegal immigrants.

She said nothing will affect the issue until leaders of countries, such as Mexico, improve the economic lives for millions living in poverty.

I'm pro-immigration, but we do need to make sure communities get help to support that population if they need it. Should that help come more from the businesses who hire immigrants? I don't know.

As far as improving economics in Mexico? That's an even taller order.

Clinton also said she would raise taxes for the wealthy, who she said "aren't paying their fair share." She also praised the economic policies of her husband that brought budget surpluses.

Not sure anymore that this is the answer, either. I'm being persuaded that tax cuts produce more tax revenue, though I haven't seen that it's proven.

One interesting note: the emails Blogger sent me about comments on my Giuliani thread produced the following Gmail ad:

Clinton Climate Change
Learn how Bill Clinton is making a difference in Climate Change battle
www.ClintonFoundation.org

Interesting that the Clinton Foundation is paying for those (unless they're getting comped as a non-profit...).

How about you? What do you think about Hillary?

6 comments:

Dan tdaxp said...

Clinton is like Giuliani, but worse: sound foreign and economic policies, but even worse expectations on the sort of judges we will get.

The best thing to do to help Mexico, of course, would be to annex it.

Sean Meade said...

re: Mexico: si, me gusta!

Jim said...

I generally like Hillary. I want to hear more from her pertaining to solutions...health care, mid east, etc. And frankly, the wealthy should pay more taxes as they would by design with a..what is that term again? Oh, National Sales Tax!
:-)

Sean Meade said...

good point, Jim! (FairTax ;-)

of course, wouldn't the economists say whether it's income tax or sales tax, though still on the rich, makes a big difference?

Anonymous said...

I'm sorry BUT we can't have a woman with her thumb on the button. No discussion. You know how they are. ;~)!

Sean Meade said...

g: a couple of answers:

1. yes, i do. they probably wouldn't press it

2. Chris Rock's answer:

come on. everyone loves white women. white men love white women. black men *really* love white women. everyone loves white women except... *white women*. they're the majority in this country. if blacks were the majority in this country, there's be a different black president every year! OJ, Flava Flav, Halle Berry...