Paul emailed me a WSJ article on the non-nonpartisan watchdogs who are going after DeLay: In Washington, Watchdogs Bear Watching.
I have no doubt that these folks are biased. But I didn't see anything in the article that actually refuted the allegations against DeLay, or even cast doubt on them. Did you?
It's OK if they're out to get him if he's guilty ;-)
That's about all the balance I can muster up. Am I missing something?