- sense of humor
- humility -- including humble origins, being a man of the people, and being able to admit when he was wrong
- he even sometimes took blame that wasn't his
- didn't take things personally
- confident
- had one, chief goal
- was guided by what seemed practicable given the situation
- persistent
- pushed the war despite failures and against contrary special interests
- great communicator -- plain-spoken, logical, connected with his audience, storyteller
- deliberate -- made plans and drafted letters that he didn't always act on or send
- not vengeful -- let bygones be bygone, both big and small
- willing to 'sit on the fence' and not be drawn into vicious partisan politics
- basically had dictatorial powers, but did not abuse them
- ike Washington (and Cincinnatus), he could walk away
- moved slowly on slavery
- built bridges -- for example, with Congress
- curried favor with important influencers, including giving political favors, in pursuit of his one goal
And a few other reflections:
- I can't conceive doing so well as Lincoln, nor even having agreed with all of his policies if I had lived in that time.
- I wonder, though, if maintaining the union justified that terrible war. Could we have got away with no more slavery in new states and territories?
- The sympathizers in England among the cotton industry, etc., were appalling.
2 comments:
Was preserving the union worth the cost? I hadn't ever considered the implications/ consequences, separate from slavery, of that course. Very interesting!
1. Would other power struggles lead to other wars?
2. Would slavery have ended through other social forces?
3. What kind of countries would we be? How strong militarily? What would our international interest settle on?
All questions only to be answered in an alternative universe.
:-)
Aldag...I bumped a key as I hit send.
Post a Comment